Intraspecific fledgling adoption by a pair of Superb Fairy-wrens Malurus cyaneus

Andrew C. Katsis, Christine Evans, Lauren K. Common, Diane Colombelli-Négrel, Sonia Kleindorfer


Abstract

Adoption is a form of alloparenting in which an individual raises an unrelated offspring, although it is sometimes unclear whether this behaviour is adaptive or the product of reproductive error. Here, we report an observation of intraspecific adoption in a cooperatively breeding songbird, the Superb Fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. In a colour-banded population at Cleland Conservation Park, South Australia, a breeding pair with three nutritionally dependent fledglings adopted an additional male fledgling from an adjacent territory. The adoptee was first observed with the new group about 2 weeks after fledging and was regularly fed by his adoptive parents. The fledgling continued to associate with his adoptive group for at least 7 months, even though his natal group remained intact in the adjacent territory. Genetic analyses confirmed that the adopted fledgling was the product of within-pair mating and was not closely related to its adoptive parents. There is some evidence that adult fairy-wrens may discriminate against offspring based on the acoustic structure of their begging calls; however, begging calls recorded at the adoptee’s nest were equally similar to incubation calls from both the genetic and adoptive mother. Finally, we discuss similar instances in the literature of intraspecific and interspecific adoption by Superb Fairy-wrens and suggest possible explanations for this behaviour.

References


Adcock, G.J. & Mulder, R.A. (2002). Polymorphic microsatellite loci for paternity analysis in the Madagascar paradise flycatcher (Terpsiphone mutata: Aves). Molecular Ecology Notes 2,

–289.

Audacity Team (2018). Audacity: Free Audio Editor and Recorder. Version 2.3.2.

Avital, E., Jablonka, E. & Lachmann, M. (1998). Adopting adoption. Animal Behaviour 55, 1451–1459.

Baker, M.C. & Logue, D.M. (2003). Population differentiation in a complex bird sound: A comparison of three bioacoustical analysis procedures. Ethology 109, 223–242.

Colombelli-Négrel, D., Hauber, M.E., Robertson, J., Sulloway, F.J., Hoi, H., Griggio, M. & Kleindorfer, S. (2012). Embryonic learning of vocal passwords in superb fairy-wrens reveals intruder cuckoo nestlings. Current Biology 22, 2155–2160.

Colombelli-Négrel, D., Webster, M.S., Dowling, J.L., Hauber, M.E. & Kleindorfer, S. (2016). Vocal imitation of mother’s calls by begging Red-backed Fairy-wren nestlings increases parental provisioning. Auk 133, 273–285.

Cooper, R.P. (1969). Multiple feeding habits of wrens. Australian Bird Watcher 3, 145–150.

Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J.R. (1979). Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 205, 489–511.

Double, M.C., Dawson, D., Burke, T. & Cockburn, A. (1997). Finding the fathers in the least faithful bird: A microsatelliteâ€based genotyping system for the superb fairyâ€wren Malurus cyaneus. Molecular Ecology 6, 691–693.

Dunn, P.O., Cockburn, A. & Mulder, R.A. (1995). Fairy-wren helpers often care for young to which they are unrelated. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 259, 339–343.

Evans, C. & Kleindorfer, S. (2016). Superb fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus) sons and daughters acquire song elements of mothers and social fathers. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 4, 9.

Fridolfsson, A.-K. & Ellegren, H. (1999). A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. Journal of Avian Biology 30, 116–121.

Green, D.J., Cockburn, A., Hall, M.L., Osmond, H. & Dunn, P.O. (1995). Increased opportunities for cuckoldry may be why dominant male fairy-wrens tolerate helpers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 262, 297–303.

Griffiths, R., Double, M.C., Orr, K. & Dawson, R.J.G. (1998). A DNA test to sex most birds. Molecular Ecology 7, 1071–1075.

Grim, T. & Honza, M. (2001). Does supernormal stimulus influence parental behaviour of the cuckoo’s host? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49, 322–329.

Heinsohn, R.G. (1991). Kidnapping and reciprocity in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Animal Behaviour 41,

–1100.

Higgins, P.J., Peter, J.M. & Steele, W.K. (Eds) (2001). Handbook of Australian, New Zealand & Antarctic Birds, Volume 5: Tyrant Flycatchers to Chats. Oxford University Press, Melbourne.

K. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics (2019). Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software. Version 1.6.1. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://ravensoundsoftware.com/

Kalinowski, S.T. & Taper, M.L. (2006). Maximum likelihood estimation of the frequency of null alleles at microsatellite loci. Conservation Genetics 7, 991–995.

Kalinowski, S.T., Wagner, A.P. & Taper, M.L. (2006). MLâ€Relate: A computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Molecular Ecology Notes 6,

–579.

Kingma, S.A., Santema, P., Taborsky, M. & Komdeur, J. (2014). Group augmentation and the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29, 476–484.

Kleindorfer, S., Evans, C. & Colombelli-Négrel, D. (2014). Females that experience threat are better teachers. Biology Letters 10, 20140046.

Kokko, H., Johnstone, R.A. & Wright, J. (2002). The evolution of parental and alloparental effort in cooperatively breeding groups: When should helpers pay to stay? Behavioral Ecology 13, 291–300.

Langmore, N.E., Bailey, L.D., Heinsohn, R.G., Russell, A.F. & Kilner, R.M. (2016). Egg size investment in superb fairy-wrens: Helper effects are modulated by climate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283, 20161875.

Langmore, N.E., Hunt, S. & Kilner, R.M. (2003). Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature, 422, 157–160.

Lee, J.C.-I., Tsai, L.-C., Hwa, P.-Y., Chan, C.-L., Huang, A.,

Chin, S.-C., Wang, L.-C., Lin, J.-T., Linacre, A. &

Hsieh, H.-M. (2010). A novel strategy for avian species and gender identification using the CHD gene. Molecular and Cellular Probes 24, 27–31.

Maguire, G.S., Guay, P.-J. & Mulder, R.A. (2006). Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers in the southern emuâ€wren (Stipiturus malachurus: Aves). Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 422–424.

Mulder, R.A. (1995). Natal and breeding dispersal in a co-operative, extra-group-mating bird. Journal of Avian Biology 26, 234–240.

Mulder, R.A., Dunn, P.O., Cockburn, A., Lazenby-Cohen, K.A. & Howell, M.J. (1994). Helpers liberate female fairy-wrens from constraints on extra-pair mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 255, 223–229.

Richardson, N.M., Kennerley, J.A. & Feeney, W.E. (2019). First record of intraspecific adoption by a female Superb Fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. Sunbird 48, 159–161.

Riedman, M.L. (1982). The evolution of alloparental care and adoption in mammals and birds. Quarterly Review of Biology 57, 405–435.

Rowley, I. (1957). Co-operative feeding of young by Superb Blue Wrens. Emu 57, 356–357.

Rowley, I. (1965). The life history of the Superb Blue Wren, Malurus cyaneus. Emu 64, 251–297.

Rowley, I. & Russell, E. (1997). Fairy-wrens and Grasswrens: Maluridae. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Smith, L.M. & Burgoyne, L.A. (2004). Collecting, archiving and processing DNA from wildlife samples using FTA® databasing paper. BMC Ecology 4, 4.

Tidemann, S.C. (1983). The Behavioural Ecology of Three Coexisting Fairy-wrens (Maluridae: Malurus). PhD thesis. Australian National University, Canberra.

Webster, M.S., Tarvin, K.A., Tuttle, E.M. & Pruett-Jones, S. (2004). Reproductive promiscuity in the splendid fairy-wren: Effects of group size and auxiliary reproduction. Behavioral Ecology 15, 907–915.

Wysocki, D., Cholewa, M. & Jankowiak, Å. (2018). Fledgling adoption in European Blackbirds: An unrecognized phenomenon in a well-known species. Behavioral Ecology 29, 230–235.